Global crypto treasury firm BitMine Inc. is currently navigating turbulent waters. A newly published research report by 10x Research reveals that BitMine is carrying an unrealised loss of approximately US $3.7 billion on its holdings of ether (ETH).
Loss Details: What’s driving the $3.7 B shortfall?
BitMine holds around 3.56 million ETH representing about 2.94 % of the total ether supply with an average cost basis near US $4,051 per ETH. At current market values, this cost basis places BitMine well in the red, exposing the company to significant mark-to-market losses. Its “mNAV” (market-to‐net asset value) has dropped below key thresholds: a basic mNAV ratio stands at 0.77 and the diluted mNAV at 0.92.
In plain terms, this means BitMine’s publicly traded shares and crypto holdings are valued lower than the assets they hold limiting the firm’s ability to raise new capital, expand holdings or issue new shares without diluting current investors.
“Hotel California” – Trapped in the Structure
10x Research describes the situation facing digital-asset treasuries (DATs) like BitMine as a “Hotel California” scenario: you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave. Investors who bought shares when the NAV was higher now find themselves “trapped” with little realistic option to exit without crystallising large losses.
Much of this stems from fee structures and embedded costs typical of DATs that hold large crypto positions unlike standard exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which tend to offer simpler and more transparent fee models.
Enter BlackRock’s Staked-ETH ETF A New Threat
Amid this backdrop, BlackRock has registered a staked-ether ETF, a regulated product designed to offer exposure to ETH plus staking yield with a low management fee structure.
The arrival of this ETF poses a challenge to the DAT model: investors may prefer the transparency, liquidity and lower cost of ETFs over the opaque holdings and fee layers of DATs. That in turn puts pressure on firms like BitMine to justify their valuation and structure.
Market Implications & Investor Considerations
The convergence of BitMine’s large unrealised losses, shrinking mNAV ratios and competition from regulated staking products signals a broader inflection point for corporate crypto-treasury models. Key implications:
-
Valuation risk: With mNAV below 1.0, BitMine and similar firms may struggle to raise fresh capital or execute expansion strategies.
-
Fee scrutiny: Investors may shift away from higher-cost DATs toward streamlined ETF alternatives.
-
Exit risk: Shareholders who entered at higher valuations face decisions about whether to hold through a turnaround or exit at a loss.
-
Competitive pressure: BlackRock’s staking ETF might siphon capital away from DATs, accelerating the NAV contraction.
What’s Next for the Sector?
DATs must adapt. That could mean trimming fees, restructuring holdings, increasing transparency or pivoting business models to stay relevant in a landscape now populated with low-cost staking ETFs. For investors, careful scrutiny of NAV metrics, fee structures and liquidity is becoming more important than ever.
FAQs
Q1: What is BitMine’s $3.7 billion loss based on?
A1: The loss is an unrealised mark-to-market shortfall tied to BitMine’s holdings of ~3.56 million ETH, purchased at an average of ~$4,051 per ETH. With current valuations lower, the cumulative loss reaches ~$3.7 billion.
Q2: What does mNAV mean and why is it important?
A2: mNAV stands for market-to-net asset value; it compares a firm’s share price or enterprise value to its underlying crypto holdings. Values below 1.0 suggest that the market values the company’s assets at less than their book value, indicating potential capital raising or liquidity challenges.
Q3: What is meant by the “Hotel California” analogy?
A3: Coined by 10x Research in this context, it suggests that investors may enter digital-asset treasury firms but find it difficult to exit without incurring large losses, especially when NAVs fall and liquidity is limited.
Q4: Why does BlackRock’s staked-ETH ETF matter?
A4: The offering brings a regulated product with low fees and staking yield exposure, which may attract capital away from traditional DATs. This creates competitive pressure and forces DATs to justify their cost structures and models.
Q5: Are all digital-asset treasury firms affected the same way as BitMine?
A5: Not necessarily, but many DATs show similar stress on mNAV metrics and face comparable competitive threats. Each firm’s holdings, cost basis, fee structure and business model will affect its resilience.
Q6: What should investors in DATs consider now?
A6: Investors should assess the firm’s cost basis for crypto holdings, its mNAV ratio, fee structure, liquidity of shares and competition from regulated alternatives. Considering exit strategy and timing is also prudent given the NAV downside risk.